Context
The 1995 GEOS study remains an important historical and preliminary environmental source. Individual samples from that period cannot be presented as the condition of the entire site in 2026. A current assessment would require new systematic testing.
Key findings
The page separates securely documented facts from reconstruction. Comparative data from other DSC plants is used only when explicitly labelled as analogy.
How to read the evidence
Direct Forst records take priority. Report 133 is direct evidence for corporate structure, while its detailed technical inventory concerns Kraiburg.
Open questions
Further archival finds may refine dates, quantities and machine identifications. Uncertain points remain visibly marked.
