Context
The editorial method separates direct Forst evidence, reconstruction and analogy. Key sources include German archival records, USSBS Report 133, GKO No. 8609 ss and the GEOS/Preuß documentation. New material is described with provenance, date and evidential weight.
Key findings
The page separates securely documented facts from reconstruction. Comparative data from other DSC plants is used only when explicitly labelled as analogy.
How to read the evidence
Direct Forst records take priority. Report 133 is direct evidence for corporate structure, while its detailed technical inventory concerns Kraiburg.
Open questions
Further archival finds may refine dates, quantities and machine identifications. Uncertain points remain visibly marked.
